As Canadian companies transition to IFRS, it will be necessary to analyze Impairments using data that is different from that which was previously required.
Under Canadian GAAP, when an impairment test is performed, it is based on the ASSET GROUPS – the lowest level of identifiable net cash flows – cash inflows and outflows that are independent of each other.
However, under IFRS, it is the CASH GENERATING UNIT that is required – it looks at independent cash inflows, and not outflows. This may sound like a small difference, but it has a significant impact in that a company can end up with more cash generating units under IFRS, than a company would have asset groups under Canadian GAAP. Furthermore, when you start breaking up these groups into smaller amounts, there is a greater likelihood that impairments will be reported, because you are not offsetting positive cash flows from negative cash flows.
Under Canadian GAAP, it has never been necessary to review independent cash inflows alone – it has always involved combining independent cash inflows and outflows together – so IFRS will require the company to be analyzed in a different way. In this regard, data collection will need to be reviewed carefully, which most likely impact IT systems.
I hope this helps. This is one of a series of blogs that is meant to convey information relating to Canada’s transition from Canadian GAAP to IFRS.
For further information, please refer to the ongoing series of IFRS blogs on the GFS Consulting web-site and please remember to contact your accounting professional for further guidance.
Tags: Data Collection, IFRS, Impairment Test
Related Posts: IFRS and Canadian GAAP – Data Collection Issues – Accounting Systems, IFRS and Canadian GAAP – Data Collection Issues – PP&E, IFRS + C-SOX Certifications – Regulatory, GFS Consulting – April 2010 e-Newsletter, IFRS and Canadian GAAP – IAS 40 – Investment Property, IFRS and Canadian GAAP – IAS 36 – Impairment of Long-Lived Assets, IFRS and Canadian GAAP – IAS 16 – Revaluation Model, GFS Consulting – October 2009 Newsletter, IFRS Project Management – Essential Workstreams in the 5 Phase IFRS Conversion Model, IFRS conversions – Lessons Learned, IFRS Project Management – Phase 5 of the 5 Phase IFRS Conversion Model – Post Implementation, IFRS Project Management – Phase 4 of the 5 Phase IFRS Conversion Model – Implementation, IFRS Project Management – Phase 3 of the 5 Phase IFRS Conversion Model – Solution Development, IFRS Project Management – Phase 2 of the 5 Phase IFRS Conversion Model – Design and Planning, IFRS Project Management – Phase 1 of the 5 Phase IFRS Conversion Model, IFRS Project Management – 5 Phase Conversion Model, IFRS Project Management – Commencing the Diagnostic Process, IFRS Project Management – Developing an IFRS Conversion Team, IFRS Project Management – Communications, IFRS Project Management – Tone at the Top, IFRS and Canadian GAAP – Collecting Data – General Overview, IFRS and Canadian GAAP – Disclosures, IFRS and Canadian GAAP – Related Party Transactions, IFRS vs Canadian GAAP – Goodwill, IFRS vs Canadian GAAP – Provisions, IFRS vs Canadian GAAP – PP&E – Impairment, IFRS – Capitalization of PP&E Borrowing Costs, IFRS and PP&E – Commencement of Depreciation, IFRS – PP&E – Rules for Useful Life and Residual Value , IFRS and Change Management, IFRS – Investment Property and the Fair Value Model., IFRS and Canada – PP&E and Revaluation Model, IFRS vs Canadian GAAP – PP&E Componentization – Major Overhaul, IFRS vs Canadian GAAP – PP&E Componentization, IFRS vs Canadian GAAP – Statement of Cash Flows, IFRS vs Canadian GAAP – Financial Presentation, IFRS Terminology, IFRS Consulting in Canada, IFRS + Consulting, IFRS – Other Considerations, IFRS – IT Systems, IFRS Early Adoption in Canada 52-402, IFRS + SOX + Bill 198, IFRS – Insights, Canadian IFRS – Private Companies Update, IFRS – Getting started, What every Canadian CFO needs to know
Entries (RSS)